Most wattage mistakes happen before a quotation is requested. A contractor picks 60W because the last project used 60W, then discovers that this road is wider, the poles are taller, or the rainy season is longer. The result is either dark patches or an oversized system that wastes panel and battery budget.
![]()
| Road type | Wattage | Pole | Spacing | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Village lane | 20-40W | 4-6 m | 15-20 m | Pedestrian priority, low glare |
| Township road | 60-80W | 6-8 m | 25-30 m | Mixed traffic, even coverage |
| Municipal arterial | 100-150W | 8-12 m | 30-40 m | Higher mast, tighter uniformity |
| Industrial access | 80-100W | 8-10 m | 25-35 m | Dust and vibration resistance |
Doubling wattage on the same spacing creates a bright pool under each pole and dark gaps between them. Reducing spacing by five metres usually produces more even light for less money than adding 30W. This is the single most useful rule in road lighting, and the one most often ignored in quotations.
Nightly energy consumption equals power multiplied by runtime, adjusted for the dimming profile. Battery capacity must cover that consumption across the longest expected run of low-sun days, with a margin for ageing. A system sized on the annual average will fail in the worst week, which is the only week anyone remembers.
![]()
Contractors often add wattage to fix a uniformity problem. The result is a brighter pool under each pole and darker gaps between them, at a higher cost. If the complaint is “dark patches", the first fix is spacing or mounting height, not power. If the complaint is “not bright enough overall", then wattage is the right lever.
Diagnosing the complaint correctly saves more money than any negotiation on unit price.
With those five inputs, a supplier can produce a layout and a power list instead of a guess. If a quotation arrives without a layout, it is a price, not a design.