Nov 20, 2025
The chemical properties of LiFePO4 (lithium iron phosphate) and lead-acid batteries determine their significant differences in lifespan, energy efficiency, installation difficulty, and maintenance demands. These differences directly affect the operational stability, long-term costs, and applicability of solar lights. For solar lighting systems that rely on intermittent solar energy storage and need long-term outdoor operation, the choice of battery chemistry is crucial.
Cycle Life and Long-Term Reliability
LiFePO4 batteries: Their chemical structure is stable, enabling them to undergo 3000 - 5000 charge - discharge cycles. Even with deep discharge, they can maintain a long service life of 8 - 15 years. For solar lights that need daily charging and discharging, this means they can operate stably for a long time without frequent replacement.
Moreover, the built-in Battery Management System (BMS) can prevent overcharge, over-discharge and other issues that damage the battery, further extending its service life.
Lead-acid batteries: Their chemical reaction mechanism leads to a much shorter cycle life, usually only 300 - 1000 charge - discharge cycles. They can only last 2 - 4 years in solar light applications. After multiple cycles, the lead - based electrode materials are prone to aging and sulfation, which rapidly reduces battery capacity. Solar lights using lead-acid batteries need frequent battery replacement, which not only increases the workload but also may cause the lights to be out of service during the replacement period.
Energy Conversion Efficiency
LiFePO4 batteries: The electrochemical reaction during charging and discharging is efficient, with a conversion efficiency of over 90%, and some high-quality products can even reach 95 - 98%. This means that most of the solar energy collected by solar panels can be stored and converted into electrical energy for lighting. It only takes 2 - 4 hours to fully charge, allowing the battery to quickly store energy even on days with short sunny hours, ensuring the solar lights have sufficient power at night.
Lead-acid batteries: Their charge-discharge efficiency is only 70 - 80%. The internal resistance of the battery is relatively large, and a lot of energy is lost in the form of heat during charging and discharging. In addition, they need 6 - 12 hours to be fully charged. In areas with insufficient sunlight, they may not be fully charged, resulting in insufficient lighting time for solar lights at night, which seriously affects the user experience.
Installation and Structural Adaptability
LiFePO4 batteries: They have high energy density and are lightweight. A 100Ah LiFePO4 battery only weighs 11 - 15kg. This feature makes the installation of solar lights very convenient. There is no need for heavy lifting equipment, and a small number of workers can complete the installation. Meanwhile, its compact size allows flexible installation methods such as vertical or horizontal placement, which can be well-matched with integrated solar street lights and other compact solar lighting products without putting too much structural pressure on the light pole.
Lead-acid batteries: They are bulky and heavy. A 100Ah lead-acid battery weighs 25 - 30kg. When installing solar lights, it requires more labor or even lifting tools. Moreover, due to their heavy weight, higher requirements are imposed on the load-bearing capacity of the light pole and the installation foundation.
For some lightweight solar light brackets or complex terrain installation scenarios such as mountain trails, the use of lead-acid batteries is very restrictive.
Environmental Adaptability and Safety
LiFePO4 batteries: They have excellent thermal stability and can work normally in the temperature range of -20°C to 60°C, with a capacity loss of less than 15%. They are not prone to fire or explosion even in extreme weather such as high temperatures. In addition, the materials of LiFePO4 batteries are non-toxic and pollution-free, which is in line with environmental protection requirements.
Lead-acid batteries: Their performance is greatly affected by temperature. When the temperature is lower than 0°C, their capacity will be reduced by 30 - 50%. At high temperatures above 40°C, there is a risk of thermal runaway.
Moreover, lead-acid batteries contain lead and sulfuric acid electrolyte. If they are damaged, the electrolyte will leak and cause soil and water pollution. At the same time, lead is a toxic heavy metal, which will also cause harm to the environment and human health during production and recycling.
Maintenance and Long-Term Cost
LiFePO4 batteries: They are maintenance-free. There is no need to add electrolyte or perform other regular maintenance operations during use.
Although their initial purchase cost is high, the long service life and low replacement frequency mean that the long-term cost per cycle is only 1/3 of that of lead-acid batteries.
For large-scale solar lighting projects, it can save a lot of replacement and maintenance costs.
Lead-acid batteries: They require regular maintenance. The electrolyte will volatilize during use, and it is necessary to regularly check and supplement the electrolyte to avoid battery failure. Their low initial cost is offset by frequent replacement and maintenance costs.
For example, a lead-acid battery for solar lights needs to be replaced every 2 - 3 years, and the cumulative replacement cost over 10 years is much higher than the cost of a LiFePO4 battery.
Read More
IPv6 network supported.
